Can "Cloth Shoes Academician" "Professor Du" Change The Established Image?

< p > long beard and black coat. An old man who has stepped on black cloth shoes and no socks is sitting in front of the University of China Academy of Sciences.

This is a working picture of academician Li Xiaowen, academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Some people say that he is like a sweeping monk in the eight dragon, seemingly silent, but has amazing talent and magic.

< /p >

"P" is also a scholar's demeanor, so that all kinds of loud screams "one professor" is dressed in fashion and handsome, so that the media days of the Beijing international automobile exhibition not long ago can hardly afford fans.

< /p >

< p > two "modeling" is very different, but the author thinks that their popularity is more or less derived from a kind of "subversion". Some people believe that scientists have a holy halo on their heads, stereotyped figures wearing thick glasses, dressed badly and buried in scientific research. The image of "all professors" is contrary to their understanding. In the eyes of other people, scientists often have many titles, enter various meetings forums, and face various topics of events. The image of academician Li Xiaowen has changed this impression.

< /p >

Over the years, a rigid and abstract mode of publicity has given scientists a coat of "high P". The public's understanding of them often lies in the worship of knowledge rather than the recognition of knowledge.

Some people are very impressed by the scholars who are rich in learning and rich in learning, but do not want to know what he has done for them. They will be grateful to scientists for their dedication and selflessness, but they are doubtful about their work, which is enough to change the technological innovation of life.

So when the image of the above conceptualized and modular scientists is subverted, public opinion is in an uproar.

< /p >

< p > and scientists themselves also have a disregard for public image building.

Some scientists who think that knowledge is omnipotent and regard themselves as the incarnation of truth, or do not bother to cross their professional disciplines, or are busy running projects or funds, they hurt the public image of scientists.

Therefore, people's vision of returning to the "scientific spirit" has followed.

< /p >

< p > scientists are indeed a bitter character. They live a monotonous, boring and lonely life. They are regarded by the public as a professional abstract symbol and an outsider away from society.

The image of scientists is directly related to the degree of public trust in science. Its role in effective dissemination of science is immeasurable, and it also guides scientific distribution of values and interests in promoting scientific progress.

< /p >

< p > whether it is a professor or a cloth shoe academician, the charm of scientists has the mysterious attraction and charisma of science itself, as well as their personal charm in exploring the unknown. They can bring new ideas and new concepts to the world, and can also discover their spiritual influence on the progress of human civilization with their persistent exploration.

But for the public, what is more recognised is that those who can make the right judgments at the critical moment of major events are those who can make outstanding contributions in national defense construction or the important areas of national economy and people's livelihood; they are those who dare to persist in scientific judgement rather than drift with the tide.

It is their lack that results in the "deviation value" of the scientist's image in the public view.

< /p >