Cotton Problem That Has Not Been Fully Excavated And Considered

Less than half of P > 12th Five-Year, if we talk about the biggest development achievement of "a target=" _blank "href=" //www.sjfzxm.com/ "textile > /a", I am afraid it will be difficult to choose one of them in a moment. But feeling the pain, the cotton problem is the first choice without doubt.

Over the past three years, the state has been collecting and storing on average 40% higher than the international market, resulting in domestic cotton prices substantially higher than the international market. China's cotton textile a target= "_blank" href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/" > clothing < /a > the competitiveness of products has been continuously losing, and the efficiency of cotton textile enterprises has declined, and the number of jobs has decreased.

If it is converted to a more far-reaching and multidimensional perspective, some problems that are hidden in the continuous development of the textile industry chain and even the harmonious development of the society may not be fully excavated and thought.

< /p >

< p > one is the suffering of the industrial system.

As domestic and foreign cotton prices are too large, cotton textile enterprises in China have been limiting production and shutting down production in recent two years, and the import of cotton yarn has doubled.

If this trend continues for a long time, the scale of the domestic spinning industry will shrink, not only will the cotton farmers gain more protection, but the integrity of the textile industry system will also be damaged.

In recent years, China's textile industry still has strong international competitiveness under the pressure of continuous rising manufacturing costs. The integrated competitive advantage brought by the complete industrial system is one of the fundamental supporting factors.

If the spinning link is reduced too fast due to the poor cotton price, the textile industry chain will gradually lose its systematic coordination and integration efficiency advantages in product development and quality control, and will also affect the vertical integration development and economies of scale of the backbone enterprises.

The regulation policy in the industrial chain is very thoughtful, and the ultimate cost may be the whole industry.

< /p >

< p > two is the consideration of industrial layout.

Since the normalization of cotton purchase and storage has caused a high price difference, the momentum of domestic cotton textile enterprises' outward investment has become increasingly strong.

However, unlike the market pfer based on factor distribution, the driving force of most cotton spinning enterprises' "leaving" behavior is just the cotton price difference caused by improper policy at present.

In the case of serious shortage of downstream industries and limited resources and environmental capacity, it is worth worrying about the sustainability of simple pursuit of spreads and pfer of layout.

Or because the domestic policy adjustment has narrowed the difference between the inside and outside cotton prices, or is just the natural result of market development. In short, it is simply based on the poor cotton price and the lack of long-term design of industrial pfer. The bottleneck of development does not take much time.

By then, no matter whether the industries that have been pferred will be rearranged and rearranged, the losses in time and efficiency will be irreparable.

< /p >

< p > three is the injury of consumer welfare.

Domestic cotton prices are pushed up by the policy. Some textile enterprises can not pass the cost of production efficiency, and will inevitably pmit along the industrial chain to the consumer terminals.

When the evaluation of cotton policy is still focused on agriculture, industry and circulation, the price of domestic cotton textiles has gradually increased, and the cotton products that are necessary for mass consumption are quietly changing to the "luxury consumer goods".

Moreover, the continuous rise of cotton prices and their irreplaceable nature in consumption habits may create a hotbed for some non-standard market behaviors, such as the actual fiber components of the product are not consistent with the labels.

In the decision-making process of the whole cotton regulation policy, consumer welfare may not really enter the vision of decision-makers, but consumers have become one of the main bodies who really bear the cost of policy.

< /p >

< p > > a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_q.asp" > policy > /a > decision is a difficult and complicated process, but the conversion to multidimensional and far-reaching perspectives on cotton may be able to get the correct solution.

Respect and try to give full play to the positive role of market regulation, give full consideration to short-term interests and long-term sustainable development, and take into consideration the interests of those who are far away from the decision-making center and actually bear the cost of policy, should always be a basic focus in the decision-making process.

< /p >